Started logging meeting in #ubuntu-meeting
[05:12:14] <diwic> First; anybody want a topic to add, something we should discuss?
[05:12:27] <TheMuso> So I assume we don't have an agenda...
[05:13:03] <diwic> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Audio/MeetingAgenda
[05:13:58] <diwic> [TOPIC] Anything in particular we want to discuss
[05:14:50] <diwic> So; a few days ago I found bug #579300, about OSS emulation removal and a few angry users having their features removed.
[05:14:52] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 579300 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please disable CONFIG_SOUND_OSS* and CONFIG_SND_*OSS*" [Wishlist,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/579300
[05:15:17] <diwic> I still think it's the right thing to do but I would like some arguments :-)
[05:16:04] <diwic> TheMuso, do you know more than I do?
[05:16:11] <TheMuso> no
[05:16:44] <diwic> ok; so basically, this was Daniel's decision and we trust him?
[05:17:18] <TheMuso> We both made the decision, as Fedora and other distros have disabled it as well. We meant to get ossproxy packaged for maverick, but that didn't happen.
[05:17:53] <rodrigo_> so, this is to make oss apps use pulseaudio?
[05:18:01] <TheMuso> Yes
[05:18:11] <rodrigo_> then yes, +1 :-)
[05:19:03] <diwic> TheMuso, so let's add an action item to package ossproxy for Natty, if we think that'll help
[05:19:12] <diwic> Any volunteers?
[05:19:13] <TheMuso> It will help.
[05:19:30] <TheMuso> If its trivial, I could probably get it packaged when I have a few spare cycles.
[05:19:42] <TheMuso> But if someone wants experience in packaging, them feel free to take it, and I am happy to review it.
[05:19:47] <rodrigo_> same here, if it's too complicated, I might need help
[05:20:05] <rodrigo_> TheMuso, ok, I'll take it, and ask you for help if I can't, ok?
[05:20:11] <TheMuso> Sounds good.
[05:20:40] <diwic> [AGREED] rodrigo_ to package ossproxy for Natty (with assistance from TheMuso if necessary)
[05:21:12] <diwic> Or was that "Action"? Who knows :-)
[05:21:23] <TheMuso> I think action is what you want.
[05:21:30] <diwic> [ACTION] rodrigo_ to package ossproxy for Natty (with assistance from TheMuso if necessary)
[05:22:39] <diwic> Ok, anything else?
[05:23:02] <diwic> Let's move on
[05:23:16] <diwic> [TOPIC] Any bugs we should look into in particular?
[05:23:33] <diwic> What's pestering you the most currently?
[05:24:12] <rodrigo_> not much, audio working quite good, even on natty :)
[05:24:26] <diwic> fantastic :-)
[05:24:59] <diwic> I'm currently trying to make upstream ALSA understand the need for consistent volume control naming
[05:25:14] <rodrigo_> there's still the GTK3 bugs for indicator, bit the desktop team has plans to coordinate that with unity
[05:25:24] <rodrigo_> so, no pestering there
[05:26:17] <diwic> The "Front" volume control or switch sometimes control front line-out only, and sometimes headphones and/or internal speakers as well
[05:26:43] <rodrigo_> nice :)
[05:26:45] <diwic> Front as in the channel (i e not C/LFE/surround), not as in location
[05:27:13] <diwic> with the result that we can't code PulseAudio in a way that'll work everywhere
[05:27:53] <diwic> I discovered that we have a PA patch that adds "Master Front", and we let that mean something controlling HP and Speakers as well, and let "Front" control the line-out only
[05:28:45] <diwic> But upstream doesn't like the "Master Front" and want to change the other name instead
[05:30:10] <diwic> *sigh*
[05:30:24] <diwic> so now that I've finished moaning, let's move on
[05:30:42] <rodrigo_> :)
[05:30:46] <diwic> [TOPIC] Anything in particular we've been working on the previous week
[05:30:54] <diwic> [TOPIC] Anything in particular we've been working on the previous week
[05:31:17] <diwic> Well, I've actually started a little on the audio apport symptom
[05:32:04] <diwic> I wrote a "Jack" parser from the codec file, see http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/535499/
[05:32:22] <diwic> Do you think it looks good?
[05:32:24] <TheMuso> Cool.
[05:33:23] <rodrigo_> looks ok, but too complex for basic users, I think
[05:34:22] <rodrigo_> but looks ok for someone really knowing what is it
[05:34:35] <diwic> rodrigo_, hmm? It was based on the suggestion on the UDS session that normal users want to relate to the Jacks rather than the card name
[05:34:48] <rodrigo_> ah, ok
[05:34:49] <TheMuso> Since I am on rotatino, I just did a little reading of bug mail, and merged packages from Debian, mainly jack stuff.
[05:35:15] <diwic> rodrigo_, but I'm open for suggestions
[05:35:27] <diwic> TheMuso, so anything interesting coming in from Debian at this point?
[05:35:35] <rodrigo_> on my part, since we now have libcanberra-gtk3 in natty, started working on packaging stuff that use it, like gnome-media
[05:35:49] <rodrigo_> diwic, not sure what to suggest, so I'll shut up for now :-)
[05:36:07] <diwic> rodrigo_, ok, let me know if you have improvement ideas
[05:36:14] <rodrigo_> yes, I will
[05:36:37] <TheMuso> not that I know of.
[05:36:43] <TheMuso> nothing jack wise anyway.
[05:36:47] <rodrigo_> although I guess we could accompany that in the UI with a nice picture of the jacks
[05:36:54] <rodrigo_> that should make it user-friendly
[05:37:03] <rodrigo_> can we do that in the apport stuff?
[05:37:08] <TheMuso> Oh rtkit is now synced with Debian, so rtkit is not maintained in pkg-multimedia repos in debian.
[05:37:10] <rodrigo_> that is, add an image to the dialog?
[05:37:20] <TheMuso> s/not/now/
[05:37:36] <diwic> TheMuso, do you have upload rights for those things in Debian?
[05:37:42] <TheMuso> No.
[05:38:19] <TheMuso> But I have git commit access, so if we need something urgently, I can always temporarily create an Ubuntu branch, make an Ubuntu package, and merge the changes into debian's branch, and an upload to debian will straighten things out.
[05:39:08] <diwic> rodrigo_, it's going to be hard for the cli version ;-)
[05:39:32] <rodrigo_> diwic, well, average users would probably always use the GUI version, right?
[05:39:45] <persia> There's a fair few folk active in Ubuntu with upload access for pkg-multimedia stuff, so it's not typically hard to get an upload there.
[05:40:31] <diwic> rodrigo_, but for gtk, it should be possible, I think that'll require a little more knowledge in apport than I currently have
[05:40:42] <rodrigo_> diwic, ok, I'll have a look
[05:40:55] <diwic> rodrigo_, are you familiar with apport/python?
[05:41:12] <rodrigo_> not much with apport, but a little bit, so will look at it
[05:42:13] <diwic> ok
[05:43:22] <diwic> rodrigo_, lets chat a little about that after the meeting if you like
[05:43:29] <rodrigo_> ok
[05:44:21] <diwic> Other than that, I've been quite busy with HWE work these weeks, so there hasn't been that much time to do other things
[05:44:41] <rodrigo_> HWE?
[05:45:00] <diwic> HWE = HardWare Enablement, i e what I'm hired for :-)
[05:45:05] <rodrigo_> ah, ok :)
[05:45:35] <diwic> Anything else?
[05:46:00] <diwic> let's move on
[05:46:06] <diwic> [TOPIC] Anything in particular we plan to do the coming week?
[05:46:53] <rodrigo_> for me, packaging ossproxy and look at the apport stuff, apart from packaging more stuff that uses the libcanberra-gtk3 thing
[05:47:44] <diwic> I'll hope I have some time to continue on the apport symptom, perhaps also start on some of the pro-audio-secured stuff.
[05:47:54] <TheMuso> Me, nothing on the audio front, unless I am prodded by someone to review/upload audio related packages. :)
[05:48:45] <diwic> As for these meetings, I think every 14 days will suffice, rather than once a week, or what do you think?
[05:49:08] <TheMuso> Seconded.
[05:49:41] <diwic> Btw, do any of you have gmail accounts?
[05:50:02] <TheMuso> No, but I do have a canonical calendar hosted on Google.
[05:50:08] <TheMuso> i.e a canonical.com google calendar.
[05:51:14] <diwic> TheMuso, the same goes for me, and it might cause problems with the fridge calendar
[05:51:26] <diwic> But I'll struggle with it to next meeting :-)
[05:51:51] <TheMuso> heh
[05:52:35] <rodrigo_> diwic, yes, rodrmoya@gmail.com
[05:53:58] <diwic> rodrigo_, would you mind following https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Fridge/Calendar instructions and try to set up a meeting dec 7?
[05:54:14] <diwic> rodrigo_, and see if it works better for you?
[05:54:20] <rodrigo_> ok
[05:55:16] <diwic> [AGREED] Meeting interval is every 14 days, next meeting is Dec 7.
[05:55:44] <awolfson> hello
[05:55:55] <TheMuso> Is there anything else that I need to be present for? Its getting late here...
[05:56:21] <diwic> TheMuso, I was about to end the meeting unless awolfson or someone else has anything to add?
[05:56:23] <rodrigo_> so, Dec 7 at 12PM CET, right?
[05:56:32] <diwic> rodrigo_, right
[05:56:47] <TheMuso> diwic: sounds good.
[05:57:39] <diwic> ok, let's end the meeting then
[05:57:41] <diwic> #endmeeting
Meeting ended.